Reject for major revision

Author: dxfz

August undefined, 2024

WebDec 4, 2024 · An editor may use “reject with option to resubmit” to mean “revise and resubmit” for a number of reasons: To emphasize that the revisions required are (seriously) major, going well beyond what would typically be associated with a “major revision.”. The editor wants to make it clear that the authors need to write a new paper, not ... WebIn this case, the editor may choose “Reject and Resubmit” rather than “Major Revision” for the manuscript decision. Do not treat this as a rejection and get depressed—it is an …

Reviewing: Major Revision or Reject?

WebIn this case, the paper should probably be rejected, because two major revisions are not allowed. HOWEVER, an editor can say: "I reject this paper, but you should go through a … WebMajor revision. The manuscript could be suitable for publication after the author(s) have responded to the reviewer comments and made changes where necessary. These changes could include redoing experiments or a substantial rewrite of several sections. Reject – encourage submission in another RSC journal sutherland 20/20 mk2

Reviewing: Major Revision or Reject? - George Mason University

WebJan 4, 2024 · If you think the issues with the manuscript can be fixed, the authors should be given the chance to do a revision - if those are major issues, or a large number of issues, then a major revision. If you think the issues cannot be fixed (or after fixing it would be in … WebAug 19, 2024 · Yes, a good examiner will read the thesis line by line. There are five possible outcomes from the examination of a thesis. Accepted without corrections. Minor … WebAug 22, 2024 · For journals I have managed, the number of “major revision” papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. When editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it … sutherland 30 inch vanity

RCN nurses vote to reject latest government pay offer ITV News

Web2 hours ago · 8 Mins Ago. LONDON - Britain’s main nursing union said on Friday its members had rejected a government pay offer and immediately announced an escalation in strike action. Hopes had been high ... WebAnswer (1 of 5): Read the reviews. Why was it rejected? It is probable you did not address the reviewer comments in an adequate fashion. That is the usual reason I see papers rejected after major revisions in the journals I edit. Decide if you can further modify the paper and submit it elsewhere... sutherland 20/20WebApr 11, 2024 · 130 Regal, Eastgate, and other movie theaters could close in the US — see the list of those already shuttering. Travis Clark and Sindhu Sundar. Apr 11, 2024, 5:42 AM. A Texas bankruptcy court ... sutherland 20/20 mk2 review

"WebOct 1, 2012 · 49. In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the … " - Reject for major revision

Reject for major revision

Publishing in a scholarly journal: Part three, peer review

WebJan 19, 2024 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions.Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. Then I received a reject letter from the new … WebAnswer (1 of 6): This happened to me once, though I was given a notional reason that they rejected if not happy after two rounds of reviews. In fact, I learnt that the reviewers were happy with the final version, and surprised to hear that it had been rejected. It went to another, but less highl...

Did you know?

WebJan 27, 2024 · 15. Revise and resubmit means exactly what it says: if you revise the manuscript and resubmit it, we will look at it again (hopefully with the same editor and … WebMy personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. That's why I would expect a major-revisions decision to ultimately end up with a …

Webinterest, or of major interest only if paper is substantially revised Minor errors (rounding errors; minor mismatch with text/tables/figures); •Components present but mayneedminor forreadability •Subject matter is original pressworthy,and important • components present; •Data are accurate and match text; •Well‐written, concise, clear WebApr 13, 2024 · Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major …

WebJun 15, 2024 · 文章目录背景1. Reject2. Major Revision3. Minor Revision4. Accept背景在投国际会议（如AAAI、IJCAI）时，一般会收到邮件直接告知你结果是 Accept 或者 Reject。 … WebApr 13, 2024 · In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after …

WebNov 30, 2024 · Recommendations of major revision resulted in a greater than 16% decrease in the probability of the paper being accepted in contrast with a recommendation of a minor revision. 2 Answers 2 I have …

WebPapers having two reviewers’ recommendations to accept and minor revision have much greater chance of acceptance (more than 98%) than papers receiving two reviewers’ recommendations that include a major revision and a reject or two rejections (which results in an acceptance rate of less than 5%): (Figure 1). sutherland 20/20 reviewWebI put "Major Revision" instead of "reject" for a very simple reason - "an interesting study denies some of the assumptions held by a certain audience" (Davis, M.S. (1971), “That’s interesting! sutherland 24 actorWebApr 25, 2024 · It is totally different from "accept with major revision" (which might be finally rejected if poorly revised), and "accept with minor revision". Cite 25th Dec, 2024 sizes of spark plug wrenchesWebNov 5, 2012 · The associate editor has expertise in the field of holistic nursing research, education, practice, or aesthetics. The associate editor makes one of four recommendations for publication: accept, accept with minor revisions, major revisions required with no guarantee of acceptance, and reject. sutherland 24WebAccept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject in the questionnaire. Give specific feedback that enables authors to improve their work, erring on the side of constructive criticism, rather than falsely positive reviews that may result in later rejection and disappointment. Your report should be written in simple neutral language, sutherland 30 in. vanity -includes mirrorWebMajor revision. Your article has a chance of being accepted, but the reviewers have requested substantial changes to be made. These changes are expected to take … sizes of soup bowls with handlesWeb12 hours ago · Research finds managers are less likely to pursue viable ideas that come from internal versus external sources. But there are ways to minimize the bias. A splendid idea from an internal ... sutherland 36 in vanity